Internet Gambling Laws – Hit or Miss?
Legal officials are looking at gambling laws that up this point have been relatively undefined, after exceeding the normal parameters of growth, and blowing up into such a big industry that it is becoming ingrained in the public mind. According to Lawrence G Walters, one of the attorneys working at firstamendment.com (Walters Law Group), “The law surrounding internet gambling have been murky to say the least.“
lot of information – http://basta-casino.se/
The Problem with US Laws – Out of Date and Not Effective
At the same time as we are in a fog over here as to what’s what, gambling laws in the UK have made things way easier for people. The Gambling act of 2005, basically took the whole business of online regulated gambling, and handed people the ball. In an attempt to prevent gambling from being a breeding ground for thieves, hackers, and con artists, the united Kingdom’s gambling act was passed to help keep gambling on the up and up, and also to keep kids, and others away from becoming victims of the gambling operation.
The United States is still implementing the 1961 Wire Wager Act, while the UK has dropped the old laws, passed new ones, and incorporated a new gambling commission to regulate the trade, and license new operators.
According to several others, including Walters, who constitute the gest of the internet gambling scene, The US Department of Justice still say that gambling is illegal according to the 1961 Wire Act. However, there are loopholes in the law, that prevent officials from coming full on to address issues with all online gambling, keeping their hands tied in sort of a catch 22. The Wire Wager Act was intended to compliment and support local ordinances in various states regarding their local gambling laws, and focused mainly on betting and wagering, or more specifically, using electronic communications to place bets and wagers on sporting events and things of that nature. For that matter, the Wire Wager Act addresses receiving money or credit as a result of these activities as well.
However, as many advocates and attorneys of the fair internet gambling laws are stressing, other forms of gambling are simply not address within the act. this has left a areas of gambling open for assumptions, especially in reference to gambling using the World Wide Web to play internet games.
In October 2006, a law was passed that addressed the confusion surrounding the laws on internet gambling. On the 13th of October 2006, President Bush signed an “Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act“, (UIEGA) that was intended to limit online financial gambling transactions. However, as long as the federal gambling laws can clearly define simple things, like the legal gambling age, the “UIGEA” is still going to have holes in it. Attorneys such as Laurence G Walters have pointed out that the new law only references points of exchange in gambling that are illegal, specifically regarding wagers and transactions. Some forms of gambling are legal, and some are not. That’s where they left it. Right after the law was passed, US gamblers were mostly unable to gamble online, but all the UIGEA did was create more confusion. Consequently of course, offices were quickly set up outside the US, to enable US gamblers to be invited.
State Laws on Gambling
Some states have passed their own laws regarding gambling. Some before the 2006 UIEGA, and some after. In some states they have prohibited online gambling. In some states, it’s even illegal to place a bet online. Some people are angry about the state laws, saying that they are unconstitutional, because commerce across state lines should solely be the say of the federal law.
In the US, you won’t find any commercial online gambling businesses. They are all in other countries, such as Malta, Gibraltar and Curacao. UK law since 2005 allows these companies, but the US laws are not so relaxed about the idea, but they at showing signs of reform. At least once the US has ruled in cases that state laws are not being violated with “online gambling”. Set a google alert, and stay tuned to this issue if you are interested in following it.
The US Should Be Regulating and Fixing the Economy – “X – OUT” The Christmas List
Attention has been turned, due to the amount of revenue being generated by online gambling, as to whether or not the US should be more closely regulating the trade, in exchange for economic recovery. They have a lot of proof already of the help they will get out of allowing gambling, due to the massive contributions from statewide gambling such as lottery tickets, casinos, and riverboats.
Part of this effort rests in the hands of 100 legal representatives, whose sole purpose is to keep the keep the Worldwide Web out the hands of federal regulations and intervention. Other parties have become involved, such as poker coach Bob Ciaffone, who was a delegate at the 2008 Democratic National Convention, seem to believe that regulation of gambling should be focusing their efforts on reducing the competition in online gambling from outside the US, so that the federal government can benefit from statewide gambling. Ciaffone also urges US lawmakers to keep online gambling separate from the 1961 Wire Act, stating that the Wire Act was for gambling over the phone, and shouldn’t be relevant to online gambling.
Apparently, all the latest UIEGA law passed in October of 2006, was screw the US out of a LOT of money, that they could be regulating and playing smart with.
“Allow opportunities so they won’t become missed opportunities.” – Franklin Gillette